You need to sign in to do that
Don't have an account?
JeffStevens
Finding duplicates, SOQL in force.com explorer
I'm using Fore.com Explorer to test this soql...
Select RL_Batch_Line_Number__c, count(Id)
from rebate_History__c
Where RL_Batch_Number__c = 999
group by RL_Batch_Line_Number__c
Having Count(Id) > 1
But I get a malformed query Error at my "group by" clause.
Anybody know what I might be doing wrong?
Well - it must have something to do with my custom field. That field is USED in a formula (it is NOT a formula though - just used in a formula). Anyway, this works...
Select Account__c, count(Id)
from rebate_History__c
Where RL_Batch_Number__c = 999
Group by Account__c
Having Count(id) > 1
I think I can work with this. I'm going to go ahead and mark this as the solution.
All Answers
Seems like a field name problem.
Copying your code and replacing the field names with ones in my org and it performs the soql
Execute the Query in parts to find root cause...
Try this First--
Select RL_Batch_Line_Number__c, count(Id)
from rebate_History__c
group by RL_Batch_Line_Number__c
Having Count(Id) > 1
Seems problem with Where Clause...
Ya - I can do these and they work just fine. It's as soon as I try to group it..
Select RL_Batch_Line_Number__c
from rebate_History__c
Where RL_Batch_Number__c = 999
order by RL_Batch_Line_Number__c
(Returns an ordered list...)
Select Count(RL_Batch_Line_Number__c)
from rebate_History__c
Where RL_Batch_Number__c = 999
(Returns one number)
No - I think it's the Group by clause that causing it.
Here is the message when I take the "having" clause out...
MALFORMED_QUERY:
group by RL_Batch_Line_Number__c
^
ERROR at Row:3:Column:10
field 'RL_Batch_Line_Number__c' can not be grouped in a query call
Well - it must have something to do with my custom field. That field is USED in a formula (it is NOT a formula though - just used in a formula). Anyway, this works...
Select Account__c, count(Id)
from rebate_History__c
Where RL_Batch_Number__c = 999
Group by Account__c
Having Count(id) > 1
I think I can work with this. I'm going to go ahead and mark this as the solution.