function readOnly(count){ }
Sign Up ›
Starting November 20, the site will be set to read-only. On December 4, 2023,
forum discussions will move to the Trailblazer Community.
Learn More

Browse by Topic
ShowAll Questionssorted byDate Posted
+ Start a Discussion
Prajapati.LakhanPrajapati.Lakhan 

"Territory and Subordinates" group in territory assignment rules

 

Does someone has any idea, how to use "Territory and Subordinates" group while configuring account assignment rule?

 

 

Thank You,

Jeff MayJeff May

Territories are defined in a hierarchy (just like Roles).  The assignment can be either a Territory member, or a Territory member and any Territory below in the hierarchy.
Saibal Roy 7Saibal Roy 7
@Jeff May
if the territory structure is like this (Top > Down L1 > Down L2):
Node > Sub-Node 1, Sub-Node 2, Sub-Node 3, Sub-Node 4...
also,.,. Sub-Node 1 > Sub-Sub-Node 1, .. ,
and.... Sub-Node 2> Sub-Sub-Node 2, .. , 
.
.
finally,,,Sub-Node N> Sub-Sub-Node N. 

This org also has an Account Sharing rule that assigns "Territory and Subordinates: Node".
Let's say a trigger has assigned the Territory= Sub-Sub-Node 2. 

In this case,can I expect the user associated with Sub-Sub-Node 1 to have access to the above mentioned Account record?