function readOnly(count){ }
Starting November 20, the site will be set to read-only. On December 4, 2023,
forum discussions will move to the Trailblazer Community.
+ Start a Discussion
SFDC n12SFDC n12 

Test class coverage help needed

Hi,

I have a trigger for which i have written a test class for it , it covers 72% , i want to increase more than it , not able to figure out how to increase,


My Trigger

 

/**
**
**/
trigger AF_processETBouncebacks on et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c (after insert) {

   Map<String,String> aeMap = new Map<String,String>();
   List<Case> casesToInsert = new List<Case>();
   List<Task> tasksToInsert = new List<Task>();
   List<et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c> bouncedEmails = new List<et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c>();
   Map<String,String> acEmailMap = new Map<String,String>();
        
   for (et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c bouncedEmail: Trigger.New) {
  
      if (bouncedEmail.et4ae5__HardBounce__c) {
           bouncedEmails.add(bouncedEmail);
       }
   }

   if (bouncedEmails.size() > 0) {
     
      for (et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c tempList : [Select et4ae5__Contact__r.AccountId from et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c Where Id IN :bouncedEmails]){ 
          acEmailMap.put(tempList.Id,tempList.et4ae5__Contact__r.AccountId);
      }
     
      Map<String, RecordType>  caseRecordTypeMap = AF_DealerCRM_Utility.getRecordTypes('Case'); 
      Map<String,Group> dealerCrmQueueMap = AF_DealerCRM_Utility.getDealerCrmQueue();
      aeMap = AF_DealerCRM_Utility.getAE(acEmailMap.values());
     
      for (et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c email: bouncedEmails) {
     
          String acId = acEmailMap.get(email.id);
         
          if (aeMap.containsKey(acId)) { 
             Task tsk = new Task();
             tsk.WhoId = email.et4ae5__Contact__c;
             tsk.OwnerId = aeMap.get(acId); 
             tsk.Subject = 'Bounceback Correction';
             tsk.ActivityDate = date.today()+5;
             tsk.CreatedById = System.Label.ExactTarget_Admin;
             tsk.Description = 'There was a bounceback for this Contact. The email send id : ' + email.et4ae5__SendDefinition__c;
             tasksToInsert.add (tsk);
          }
          else {
              // If no Autofinance AE or Additional AE exists, then create a case and assign to Sales Performance Queue.
              Case cs = new Case();
              cs.AccountId = acId;
              cs.Priority = 'Medium';
              cs.Subject = 'No AE found on Account Team';
              cs.Status = 'New';
              cs.Description = 'Please navigate to the contact on this case to re-assign the task owner';
              cs.ContactId = email.et4ae5__Contact__c;
              cs.Case_related_to__c = 'Contact';
              cs.RecordTypeId = caseRecordTypeMap.get('Sales').Id;
              cs.OwnerId = dealerCrmQueueMap.get('Case Mgmt Sales Performance').Id;
              casesToInsert.add(cs);
          }
            
      }    

      /* New Cases for AE that are not found.*/
      if (casesToInsert.size() > 0 ) {
       
         try {
            AF_DealerCRM_DML_Utility.insert_op(casesToInsert); 
         }
         catch(Exception ex) {
            system.debug('Exception while creating Case' + ex.getMessage());
         }    
      }
     
      /* New Tasks to create for bounced emails */
      if (tasksToInsert.size() > 0) {
     
         try {
             AF_DealerCRM_DML_Utility.insert_op(tasksToInsert); 
         }
         catch(Exception ex) {
             system.debug('Exception while creating Tasks for bounced emails : ' + ex.getMessage());
         }    
           
      } 
   }
 
}


My Test class :

@isTest
public class AF_processETBouncebacks{
   
    testMethod static void testProcessBouncebacksTrigger() {
        Test.startTest();
        // Create a few records to test various scenarios
       
       
        contact con = new contact();
        con.LastName ='c';
        insert con;
       
       
        Account acc = new Account();
        acc.Name ='Test';
        insert acc;
     
       
        et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c emailresult = new et4ae5__IndividualEmailResult__c();
        emailresult.et4ae5__Contact__c =con.id;
        //emailresult.et4ae5__Contact__r.AccountId=acc.id;
        emailresult.et4ae5__DateBounced__c =date.today();
        emailresult.et4ae5__HardBounce__c = true;
        emailresult.et4ae5__Opened__c = true;
        insert emailresult;
       
       
         Task tsk = new Task();
         tsk.WhoId =con.id;
         //tsk.OwnerId = aeMap.get(acId); 
         tsk.Subject = 'Bounceback Correction';
         tsk.ActivityDate = date.today()+5;
         //tsk.CreatedById = System.Label.ExactTarget_Admin;
         tsk.Description = 'There was a bounceback for this Contact. The email send id : ';
         insert tsk;
        
        
        
        
         Case cs = new Case();
         cs.AccountId = acc.Id;
         cs.Priority = 'Medium';
         cs.Subject = 'No AE found on Account Team';
         cs.Status = 'New';
         cs.Description = 'Please navigate to the contact on this case to re-assign the task owner';
         cs.ContactId = con.Id;
         cs.Case_related_to__c = 'Contact';
         insert cs;
        
        
        

        Test.stopTest();

        //Task createdTasks = [Select Id,WhoId ,OwnerId ,Subject ,ActivityDate,Description  from Task Where WhoId IN:emailresult];
        // verify if target tasks etc are created successfully
      //System.assert(tsk);

    }
  

}


i also want to add system.assert statement to my test class , can that increase my coverage


kindly help me on this class

Thanks in Advnce 

Best Answer chosen by SFDC n12
Sonam_SFDCSonam_SFDC
Yes, system.assert will surely help you increase test coverage on the liines where you are altering the field values and you can compare the new ones with the expected updated values to test the code lines.


All Answers

Sonam_SFDCSonam_SFDC
Yes, system.assert will surely help you increase test coverage on the liines where you are altering the field values and you can compare the new ones with the expected updated values to test the code lines.


This was selected as the best answer
SFDC n12SFDC n12


Thanks, it worked