I do hope this role is for a popular energy drinks brand, becase this candidate is going to need some serious caffine input to manage all those responsibilites. I agree with the previous answers that this does sound more like a role for 2 (or more) candidates, there is a big difference in the responsibilities to lead and organise a 40+ team, to effectivly train new developers, and to be "hands on with Apex developement" (incidentally, Apex is not all capitalised!).

It's not impossible that there is a candidate out there who might match these criteria, but whether they would want to split their abilities across so many work domains is unlikely, someone with those skills is most likely interested in focussing on one channel of personal/professional progression by that point in their career! They will also command a hefty compensation package, and as soon as you throw that into the mix you will get all sorts of chancers applying for the job.

I definitely agree with Matt Lacey that the 10+ year minimum requirement in OOP is perhaps a bit of a stretch, I've just hit 10 years myself (well, I will have 10 years commercial experience in 7 days! - 9/9/15) and whilst I would agree that I still get better and more experienced year on year, I would have thought that leaning on the certifications and/or a reasonable assertion of the candidates abilities (portfolio, presentations or if needs be in-house testing) would be far better. I know a LOT of developers and technical leads with way more than 10 years experience who I wouldn't let program a series link on my TiVo box. Years != Talent.

Finally, for the record (because if you want someone this good, they are going to know their sh*t!) the certifications are no longer referenced by DEV401 and DEV501 (technically they never were - those are the names of the associated training courses to assist the certification exams) they are called Platform Developer 1 and Platform Developer 2.

Good luck to your friend finding his 'Eleanor' :)