Have just started getting a problem using dataloader. I am running batch jobs that call dataloader which have worked successfully for a long time. I am now getting the following which I think is the problem (I have included the full message out put after): Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not authenticated at sun.security.ssl.SSLSessionImpl.getPeerCertificates(Unknown Source) at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.jav
I do not know of anything that has changed but this sounds to me like something needs to be generated but I have no idea how to go abut it. Any help would be appreciated. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- This uploads individual products to SFDC (i.e not the full initial load) Clear out the log folder before do anything -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- F:\SalesforceLogs\DataLoaderUpsertLogs\csvUpdateSMPickProcess.log F:\SalesforceLogs\DataLoaderUpsertLogs\errorcsvUpdateSMPickProcess.csv F:\SalesforceLogs\DataLoaderUpsertLogs\successcsvUpdateSMPickProcess.csv 3 file(s) moved. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Call the process batch file which needs a config parameter and the proce ss name parameter Batch File that identifies the driver to be used, Folder that contains t he process_conf.xml file, bean within the process_conf.xml file -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- "C:\Program Files (x86)\salesforce.com\Data Loader\Java\bin\java.exe" -cp "C:\Pr ogram Files (x86)\salesforce.com\Data Loader\DataLoader-29.0.0-uber.jar" -Dsales force.config.dir="D:\Salesforce\DataLoader" com.salesforce.dataloader.process.Pr ocessRunner process.name=csvUpdateSMPickProcess 2018-05-25 09:14:31,568 INFO [main] controller.Controller initLog (Controller.j ava:389) - Using built-in logging configuration, no log-conf.xml in D:\Salesforc e\DataLoader\log-conf.xml 2018-05-25 09:14:31,568 INFO [main] controller.Controller initLog (Controller.j ava:391) - The log has been initialized 2018-05-25 09:14:31,568 INFO [main] process.ProcessConfig getBeanFactory (Proce ssConfig.java:104) - Loading process configuration from config file: D:\Salesfor ce\DataLoader\process-conf.xml 2018-05-25 09:14:31,646 INFO [main] support.AbstractApplicationContext prepareR efresh (AbstractApplicationContext.java:495) - Refreshing org.springframework.co ntext.support.FileSystemXmlApplicationContext@1cfe4b2: startup date [Fri May 25 09:14:31 BST 2018]; root of context hierarchy 2018-05-25 09:14:31,677 INFO [main] xml.XmlBeanDefinitionReader loadBeanDefinit ions (XmlBeanDefinitionReader.java:315) - Loading XML bean definitions from file [D:\Salesforce\DataLoader\process-conf.xml] 2018-05-25 09:14:31,771 INFO [main] support.DefaultListableBeanFactory preInsta ntiateSingletons (DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:557) - Pre-instantiating singl etons in org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory@13 6f0f5: defining beans [sqlExtractSMWOLineProcessPICK,sqlExtractSMWOLineProcessRe ason,sqlExtractSMWOLineProcessStatus,sqlExtractAllSMProductProcess,csvUpdateFSLi neStatusProcess,csvUpdateSMPickProcess,sqlUpdateWorkOrderOpenProcess,csvUpdateSM ProductProcess,sqlExtractSFDCOrderProcess,sqlUpdatePTDBWarrantyInfoProcess,csvUp dateSFDCOrderHeaderWithNewOwnerProcess,sqlExtractCreditHoldInformationProcess,cs vUpdateSFDCItemTrackedProcess,sqlExtractAllProductProcess,csvInsertSMPriceBookEn tryProcessEUR,csvInsertSMPriceBookEntryProcessUSD]; root of factory hierarchy 2018-05-25 09:14:31,802 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] controller.Controller ini tConfig (Controller.java:327) - config dir created at D:\Salesforce\DataLoader 2018-05-25 09:14:31,818 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] controller.Controller ini tConfig (Controller.java:355) - The controller config has been initialized 2018-05-25 09:14:31,818 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] process.ProcessRunner run (ProcessRunner.java:116) - Initializing process engine 2018-05-25 09:14:31,818 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] process.ProcessRunner run (ProcessRunner.java:119) - Loading parameters 2018-05-25 09:14:32,473 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] config.LastRun load (Last Run.java:96) - Last run info will be saved in file: F:\SalesforceLogs\Properties Files\csvUpdateSMPickProcess_lastRun.properties 2018-05-25 09:14:32,489 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] process.ProcessRunner run (ProcessRunner.java:127) - Logging in to: https://login.salesforce.com 2018-05-25 09:14:32,489 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] client.PartnerClient logi n (PartnerClient.java:479) - Beginning Partner Salesforce login .... 2018-05-25 09:14:32,504 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] client.PartnerClient logi nInternal (PartnerClient.java:523) - Salesforce login to https://login.salesforc e.com/services/Soap/u/37.0 as user interface@incadigital.com [WSC][ProcessRunner.main:253]Log file already exists, appending to F:\Salesforce Logs\DataLoaderUpsertLogs\csvUpdateSMPickProcess.log 2018-05-25 09:14:33,144 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] dao.DataAccessObjectFacto ry getDaoInstance (DataAccessObjectFactory.java:51) - Instantiating data access object: D:\Salesforce\Extract_Import Files\SQLPickToSM.csv of type: csvRead 2018-05-25 09:14:33,144 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] process.ProcessRunner run (ProcessRunner.java:132) - Checking the data access object connection 2018-05-25 09:14:33,159 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] process.ProcessRunner run (ProcessRunner.java:137) - Setting field types 2018-05-25 09:14:33,721 INFO [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] process.ProcessRunner run (ProcessRunner.java:141) - Setting object reference types 2018-05-25 09:14:57,261 ERROR [csvUpdateSMPickProcess] client.PartnerClient runO peration (PartnerClient.java:332) - Error while calling web service operation: d escribeSObject, error was: Failed to send request to https://eu1.salesforce.com/ services/Soap/u/37.0/00D20000000MekP com.sforce.ws.ConnectionException: Failed to send request to https://eu1.salesfo rce.com/services/Soap/u/37.0/00D20000000MekP at com.sforce.ws.transport.SoapConnection.send(SoapConnection.java:121) at com.sforce.soap.partner.PartnerConnection.describeSObject(PartnerConn ection.java:1413) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient$10.run(PartnerClient.j ava:185) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient$10.run(PartnerClient.j ava:177) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient.runOperation(PartnerCl ient.java:328) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient.describeSObject(Partne rClient.java:726) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient.setFieldReferenceDescr ibes(PartnerClient.java:654) at com.salesforce.dataloader.controller.Controller.setReferenceDescribes (Controller.java:135) at com.salesforce.dataloader.process.ProcessRunner.run(ProcessRunner.jav a:142) at com.salesforce.dataloader.process.ProcessRunner.run(ProcessRunner.jav a:100) at com.salesforce.dataloader.process.ProcessRunner.main(ProcessRunner.ja va:253) Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not authenticated at sun.security.ssl.SSLSessionImpl.getPeerCertificates(Unknown Source) at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.jav a:128) at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLSocketFactory.connectSocket(SSLSocketFact ory.java:572) at org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator.openConnect ion(DefaultClientConnectionOperator.java:180) at org.apache.http.impl.conn.ManagedClientConnectionImpl.open(ManagedCli entConnectionImpl.java:294) at org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.tryConnect(Default RequestDirector.java:640) at org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.execute(DefaultReq uestDirector.java:479) at org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpCl ient.java:906) at org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpCl ient.java:805) at org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpCl ient.java:784) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.HttpClientTransport.getContent(HttpC lientTransport.java:129) at com.sforce.ws.transport.SoapConnection.send(SoapConnection.java:97) ... 10 more 2018-05-25 09:14:57,277 FATAL [main] process.ProcessRunner topLevelError (Proces sRunner.java:238) - Unable to run process csvUpdateSMPickProcess java.lang.RuntimeException: com.sforce.ws.ConnectionException: Failed to send re quest to https://eu1.salesforce.com/services/Soap/u/37.0/00D20000000MekP at com.salesforce.dataloader.process.ProcessRunner.run(ProcessRunner.jav a:162) at com.salesforce.dataloader.process.ProcessRunner.run(ProcessRunner.jav a:100) at com.salesforce.dataloader.process.ProcessRunner.main(ProcessRunner.ja va:253) Caused by: com.sforce.ws.ConnectionException: Failed to send request to https:// eu1.salesforce.com/services/Soap/u/37.0/00D20000000MekP at com.sforce.ws.transport.SoapConnection.send(SoapConnection.java:121) at com.sforce.soap.partner.PartnerConnection.describeSObject(PartnerConn ection.java:1413) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient$10.run(PartnerClient.j ava:185) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient$10.run(PartnerClient.j ava:177) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient.runOperation(PartnerCl ient.java:328) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient.describeSObject(Partne rClient.java:726) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.PartnerClient.setFieldReferenceDescr ibes(PartnerClient.java:654) at com.salesforce.dataloader.controller.Controller.setReferenceDescribes (Controller.java:135) at com.salesforce.dataloader.process.ProcessRunner.run(ProcessRunner.jav a:142) ... 2 more Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer not authenticated at sun.security.ssl.SSLSessionImpl.getPeerCertificates(Unknown Source) at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.jav a:128) at org.apache.http.conn.ssl.SSLSocketFactory.connectSocket(SSLSocketFact ory.java:572) at org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator.openConnect ion(DefaultClientConnectionOperator.java:180) at org.apache.http.impl.conn.ManagedClientConnectionImpl.open(ManagedCli entConnectionImpl.java:294) at org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.tryConnect(Default RequestDirector.java:640) at org.apache.http.impl.client.DefaultRequestDirector.execute(DefaultReq uestDirector.java:479) at org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpCl ient.java:906) at org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpCl ient.java:805) at org.apache.http.impl.client.AbstractHttpClient.execute(AbstractHttpCl ient.java:784) at com.salesforce.dataloader.client.HttpClientTransport.getContent(HttpC lientTransport.java:129) at com.sforce.ws.transport.SoapConnection.send(SoapConnection.java:97) ... 10 more Press any key to continue . . .
I have the following code in a webserve that would be querying the Account object. It has worked for years but appears to have now stopped working. The name in the id is the salesforce partner(?) that originally wrote this code but not sure if that is relevant. private sforce.SforceService GetDefaultSforceBinding() { sforce.SforceService binding = new sforce.SforceService();
if (Convert.ToBoolean(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["SFSandbox"])) binding.Url = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AlternativeSalesForceUrl"].ToString();
// set call options binding.CallOptionsValue = new sforce.CallOptions(); binding.CallOptionsValue.client = "westbrook/Inca";
return binding; } I am very new to this kind of thing so would appreciate any help.
I have a small VF page which I want to use to override the Edit button on a custom (managed package) object with a message rather than an edit page. However, if the user logged in has a particular profile, I want the action to continue and to display a custom page layout in edit mode. The folloiwng code displays the message fine for a non Custom System Administrator but otherwisde it displays an edit page that looks a standard (default) one rather than the page layout I want.
I feel like it should juts be something small to achieve this but I cannot get to it.
<apex:page standardController="SVMXC__Service_Order_Line__c" action="{!if($Profile.Name <> 'Custom System Administrator', Null, urlFor($Action.SVMXC__Service_Order_Line__c.Edit, $ObjectType.SVMXC__Service_Order_Line__c, null, true))}"> <h1>Warning:</h1> This link is disabled. Work Details may only be changed via SFM. Select the Line Number to view the Work Detail. </apex:page>
I have an on change event on my VF page which fires OK when the field is changed but the code in the controller still appears to be looking at the original value in the field rather than the the changed value - I can tell this from System.debugs I have used.. Should I be passing a parameter in some way or am I just not using the correct field in the action=
Not experienced in apex code so would appreciate some help. Within a controller I am trying to retrieve the first 3 characters of a field to either store or just query on direct.
I have the following two fields defined:
public String orderHeaderReason {get; set;} public String orderHeaderReasonFirst3 {get; set;}
and then want to use them as follows: // Save the reason specified on the OrderHeader - this works OK orderHeaderReason = orderHeader.Reason_for_Order_FOC__c;
// Save the first 3 characters of the same field - this fails orderHeaderReasonFirst3 = orderHeader.Reason_for_Order_FOC__c.substring(0,2);
//This also fails orderHeaderReasonFirst3= orderHeaderReason.substring(0,2);
I am assuming that I have not correctly defined the fields orderHeaderReason and orderHeaderReasonFirst3 but cannot see what I should be doing - I need to instantiate them in some way?
In a Controller for a VF page I have the following which opens up a small form. That bit is OK. If an error is returned from that function I want the form to remain showing (it has an error message) but it disappears after the Save button is selected on that small form and I cannot get it to remain. If there is no error then I am expecting processing to continue OK i.e the small form to have disappeared and stay disappeared.
It is this line in the following code extract that I am expecting to change. Any help would be appreciated on what the rerender statement is doing.
Having just been doing a number of unit tests whilst deploying various things, it would appear that the autonumber of cases has incrementd in line with the number of dummy cases that would have been temporarily inserted during the tests.
This means that we now have big gaps in the numbers in our production environment..
Can anyone please confirm whether this is what is probably happening and if so is there anyway to stop it?
I need to make the following piece of code work (within a trigger) for mass case updates. It works fine for when one case is updated but I know that the List<Account>.. within the for loop gives a too many soql queries message when I am mass updating. How do I move this outside the for loop but still be able to get hold of the relevant field from the associated account I want to update the case with? (I appreciate this is probably a basic thing but this is my first foray into "bulkifying").
} else if (Trigger.isUpdate && Trigger.isBefore) {
I have an insert/update trigger (not written by me) on the case object which has been working fine. I have now added a couple of new case record types but this trigger does not appear to run for either of them. Is there something I need to set to activate the trigger against these new record types?
I had assumed that the trigger was against the Case object and so would run irrespective of the record type. I am new to Apex code altogether and have a problem with knowing where to start with trying to debug this problem. There does not seem to be any hard code that refers to the record type for functions that would eliminate these record types.
Not experienced in apex code so would appreciate some help. Within a controller I am trying to retrieve the first 3 characters of a field to either store or just query on direct.
I have the following two fields defined:
public String orderHeaderReason {get; set;} public String orderHeaderReasonFirst3 {get; set;}
and then want to use them as follows: // Save the reason specified on the OrderHeader - this works OK orderHeaderReason = orderHeader.Reason_for_Order_FOC__c;
// Save the first 3 characters of the same field - this fails orderHeaderReasonFirst3 = orderHeader.Reason_for_Order_FOC__c.substring(0,2);
//This also fails orderHeaderReasonFirst3= orderHeaderReason.substring(0,2);
I am assuming that I have not correctly defined the fields orderHeaderReason and orderHeaderReasonFirst3 but cannot see what I should be doing - I need to instantiate them in some way?
Having just been doing a number of unit tests whilst deploying various things, it would appear that the autonumber of cases has incrementd in line with the number of dummy cases that would have been temporarily inserted during the tests.
This means that we now have big gaps in the numbers in our production environment..
Can anyone please confirm whether this is what is probably happening and if so is there anyway to stop it?
I need to make the following piece of code work (within a trigger) for mass case updates. It works fine for when one case is updated but I know that the List<Account>.. within the for loop gives a too many soql queries message when I am mass updating. How do I move this outside the for loop but still be able to get hold of the relevant field from the associated account I want to update the case with? (I appreciate this is probably a basic thing but this is my first foray into "bulkifying").
} else if (Trigger.isUpdate && Trigger.isBefore) {
I have an insert/update trigger (not written by me) on the case object which has been working fine. I have now added a couple of new case record types but this trigger does not appear to run for either of them. Is there something I need to set to activate the trigger against these new record types?
I had assumed that the trigger was against the Case object and so would run irrespective of the record type. I am new to Apex code altogether and have a problem with knowing where to start with trying to debug this problem. There does not seem to be any hard code that refers to the record type for functions that would eliminate these record types.
