Hello everyone!

I'm going to do my first managed package...But I have a situation!

One of my triggers has a RecordTypeId hard-coded (yes, I know I didn't have to do it, but I did....)

My question is, can I change the trigger once It is installed in the new Org, or It's going to fail forever and ever?!?!?

Thanks in advance!

Hi
 
I have written the below code in the controller.
      
      public void init()
{
         Bid=System.currentPageReference().getParameters().get('BilltoId');
        Rid=System.currentPageReference().getParameters().get('ResellerId');
        Coid=System.currentPageReference().getParameters().get('CopyId');
}   

While writing test methods i am not able to pass the parameters.Its showing code does'nt have test coverage    

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

1. Will this hack work all the time? Or was it because the location of my Workbench was a web site that had previously accessed the sandbox? Or was it because the version of Workbench I used is pretty old, version 29.0.
2. Is this a security hole? Why was I able to log in via Workbench without verification? Same questions as above.

for (UserTerritory2Association uta : [
        select User.AccountId, User.Account.Name,
        User.Account.Regional_Manager__c,
        Territory2.Name, 
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id,
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2.Name
        from UserTerritory2Association 
        where user.usertype = 'PowerPartner'
        and Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id != null]) {
        .
        .
        .
    }

List<UserTerritory2Association> utaList1 = [
        select User.AccountId, User.Account.Name,
        User.Account.Regional_Manager__c,
        Territory2.Name, 
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id,
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2.Name
        from UserTerritory2Association 
        where user.usertype = 'PowerPartner'
        and Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id != null];
    
    for (UserTerritory2Association uta : utaList1) {
        .
        .
        .
    }

We have recently enabled Partner Portal access. We wanted to limit the reports that the Partners can access.

We thought we were doing this by enabling access levels for sharing report and dashboard folders. When I change access on Report folders on folders we have created, the access does change to reflect the changes. Querying the Folder object shows the new access definitions.

But this does not work for report folders created by installed packages. Although the changes can be made, the changes do no impact the access, and the the Access in the Folder records never changes from Public.

There is some mention in the documentation about setting folder access prior to installing the package, but installation occurred years before we implemented partners. There is no way to uninstall/reinstall the packages, because if would involve literally millions of records.

Any ideas ? Anyone ?

I have a VisualForce page with multiple tabs.

Each tab has <apex:inputField> tags were required=true. The fields are not required at the object level, only on the VisualForce page.

When the page invokes any action, the action will not execute unless all required fields on all tabs, even the ones that are inactive and not visible, are completed.

This is OK. I want to user to complete all information.

My problem is that I do not have a way to let the user know that the missing information in on an inactive tab. 

Does anyone know how to determine which tabs have uncompleted required fields so that I can provide some indication to the user?

Ideally, I would like a way to change the tab indicator to show that data is complete on the tab or not.

I am guessing I need some sort of Javascript to cycle through the elements in each tab. 

Thanks.

Registration is open. Is there a code like there has been in the past? 

In further investigation, I have traced the problem to the following:

I retrieve the information on the opportunity and its current pricebook through this query:

o = [
    Select o.Id, o.Name, o.Amount, CurrencyIsoCode,
        o.Pricebook2Id, o.PriceBook2.Name,
        (Select Id, OpportunityId, SortOrder,
         PricebookEntryId, PriceBookEntry.Product2Id,
         PriceBookEntry.Product2.Name,
         CurrencyIsoCode,
         Quantity, TotalPrice,
         UnitPrice, ListPrice, ServiceDate,
         HasRevenueSchedule, HasQuantitySchedule,
         Description, HasSchedule
         From OpportunityLineItems)
    From Opportunity o
    where id = : apexPages.currentPage().getParameters().get('id')];

This works fine.

The problem is that I was displaying the pricebook name on a VisualForce page with an <apex:outputField>.

Apparently there is a change in Summer '13.

In Spring '13, this works:

<apex:outputText label="Current Price Book" value="{!o.Pricebook2.Name}"/>

In Summer '13, the page fails to load with the error:

Validation Errors While Saving Record(s)
There were custom validation error(s) encountered while saving the affected record(s). The first validation error encountered was "Currency ISO Code: invalid currency code: 000".

If I change the tag to an output text, i.e.:

<apex:outputText label="Current Price Book" value="{!o.Pricebook2.Name}"/>

Now there is no problem, and it works fine.

I just want to know why.

I have a custom object that is created to mirror the Product object whenever a new Product record is created. It fires via a trigger on the Product object.

In the Spring '13 release, with seeAllData=true, the mirror object is created without problem. With seeAllData=false, the mirror object is not created, I guess because the trigger is outside of the test space.

In the Summer '13 release, the mirror object is not created. Tests that used to work now fail because the mirror object does not exist.

I have a lot of tests that depend on this behavior. 

Is this a bug or a new feature?

I work in a org with FinancialForce and Glovia ERP installed, plus a lot of other code. There are literally hundreds of test classes.

When I select Tests, New Run, the web page typically will time out before all of the test classes are retrieved. Is there any way to limit the retrieved set before I start.

I created an apex class and a associated test class in the sandbox. The test class was hitting 96 percent of the code.

I created an outbound deployment set with just the two classes.

I tried to deploy to production. I got this errror - twice.

Failure Message: "Internal Salesforce Error: 1208510542-13565 (966319356) (966319356)", Failure Stack Trace: "null"

Failure Message: "Internal Salesforce Error: 634278088-15180 (966319356) (966319356)", Failure Stack Trace: "null"

At this point, I abandoned Deployment Sets, went back to the IDE, and it deployed without problem.

Why? Does anybody care?

I am trying to create a trigger that notifies an internal group when a Partner Portal user has been created.

The trigger works fine, but the test fails.

When I create a partner portal user, the resulting record has a usertype of "PowerPartner". This is the field I use in the trigger to determine if the user being created is a portal user. 

But when I create the portal user in the unit test, the usertype is "PowerCustomerSuccess"

My work-around is to check for both usertype values, but this is wrong.

Can anyone explain this behavior.

Last Jannuary, I talked to OpenAccess, a developer of toolkits for developing ODBC connectors, about using their product to build a connector to Salesforce.com. Although I got a 30-day trial, developing the actual connector was beyond my skills.

Last week OpenAccess contacted me about a beta version of an ODBC connector for Salesforce.com. You can download the beta version at:

http://www.openaccesssoftware.com/support/SalesF-Files-Index.asp

The installlation requires that your computer have the  Microsoft.Net framework runtime installed (obtainable from http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=262d25e3-f589-4842-8157-034d1e7cf3a3&displaylang=en).

Once you install everything (about 10 minutes), you can use the  ODBC connector to link any ODBC-compliant app to your Salesforce database.

At present, there is no pricing or licensing cost on the web site. The beta license expires on September 27. Also, the ODBC connector only supports the SELECT statement, so no UPDATE or CREATE at the moment.

I testing it by creating an ODBC connection in Excel using the new salesforce ODBC connector as my source. I could then point/click to select from all the tables in my account, including custom objects.

Lots of possibilities here, but this is all the information I have. If you want more info, contact OpenAccess.

for (UserTerritory2Association uta : [
        select User.AccountId, User.Account.Name,
        User.Account.Regional_Manager__c,
        Territory2.Name, 
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id,
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2.Name
        from UserTerritory2Association 
        where user.usertype = 'PowerPartner'
        and Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id != null]) {
        .
        .
        .
    }

List<UserTerritory2Association> utaList1 = [
        select User.AccountId, User.Account.Name,
        User.Account.Regional_Manager__c,
        Territory2.Name, 
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id,
        Territory2.ParentTerritory2.Name
        from UserTerritory2Association 
        where user.usertype = 'PowerPartner'
        and Territory2.ParentTerritory2Id != null];
    
    for (UserTerritory2Association uta : utaList1) {
        .
        .
        .
    }

Can anyone suggest, how ca we delete apex class from production.

please provide step-step process to delete it from prod. through Force.com Eclipse.